In a
surprising email, I just had someone question the accuracy of my reporting: On
April 7, 2016 near the conclusion of a meeting with Tom Mesa, a representative
of the Department of Public Health, I had noted on point 18 (see May 7, 2016
post on this blog) that employees had complained that Jonathan Vernick, the CEO
of Baker Places, had dementia; in reply Mr. Mesa said, “No, he’s a bully!”
This
statement was confirmed:
- Immediately after the meeting in talking to one of the witnesses who was present.
- In a telephone conversation on April 8, 2016 in which a witness who was present and I (Harry Petersen) recapped the meeting.
Also, note
that I emailed Mr. Mesa on April 8, 2016 about my notes of the meeting; while I
did not include the “bully” statement in this email, they were part of my
contemporaneous notes from the previous day.
Also, I
received an email from a witness on May 9, 2016 in which the above claims were
not challenged, but there was a concern about protecting Mr. Mesa from getting
into trouble.
Please note: I have prided myself on
being accurate. Where I have misstated a point, I welcome corrections. In this
case, however, all the independent lines of evidence show that my reporting was
accurate. My purpose is to arrive at the truth. I wish to thank this reader for
the email challenging this statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment